Today, we’ll be taking a look at two CPUs in particular: Both AMD and Intel appear to be playing release date games with their latest dual core processors. Intel’s affordable dual core desktop solution, the new Pentium D, officially launched in the middle of last month , but has yet to be seen in the channel. This time around, we have two chips from AMD, both officially Athlon 64 X2 processors, to give you a better feel for the actual dual core Socket performance that you’ll be seeing later this year. Log in Don’t have an account? This page was last edited on 2 September , at K8 Microarchitecture “Kuma” based models are K10 derived.
|Date Added:||23 May 2015|
|File Size:||23.93 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
AMD’s Athlon 64 X2 4800+ & 4200+ Dual Core Performance Preview
We’ve already discussed the pricing and lineup of AMD’s Athlon 64 X2 line, but as a quick refresher, here are the tables from our original review: The primary benefit of dual-core processors like the Athlon 64 X2 over single-core processors is their ability to process more software threads at the same time.
The need for TLP processing capability is dependent on the situation to a great degree, and certain situations benefit from it far more than processsor. The CPUs still won’t be available until Q3 or Q4 of this year, but AMD appears to want to get performance numbers out there as soon as possible; given the impressive performance that we had previewed in our first articleit’s not much of a surprise from AMD.
This lower yield makes the X2 more expensive to produce than the 480 processor. Both AMD and Intel appear to be playing release date games with amr latest dual core processors. We’ve talked quite a bit about the impact of dual core on the desktop, but to keep things to the point, if you’re interested in knowing a bit more, please take a look back at the following topics: Programs often written with multiple threads and corr of utilizing dual-cores include many music and video encoding applications, and especially professional rendering programs.
Retrieved from ” https: For starters, the Athlon 64 X2’s clock speeds aren’t that low compared to the current single-core Athlon 64z2.
AMD’s Athlon 64 X2 + & + Dual Core Performance Preview
In other projects Wikimedia Commons. File Compression Multitasking Scenario 3: Multi-tasking also runs a sizable number of threads; intense multi-tasking scenarios have actually shown improvements of considerably more than two times. These applications can realize almost twice the performance of a single-core Athlon 64 of the same specifications.
Views Read Edit View history.
Log in Don’t have an account? Sign up now Username Password Remember Me.
Athlon 64 X2 – Wikipedia
Early x86 bit Am As a result, a larger area of silicon must be defect free. Note that the timing of today’s article doesn’t mean that there’s any change in the Athlon 64 X2 release or shipping schedule. By placing two cores on the same die, the X2 effectively doubles the TLP over a single-core Athlon 64 of the same speed.
We used the latest Catalyst 5. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This time around, we have two chips from AMD, both officially Athlon 64 X2 processors, to give you a better feel for provessor actual dual core Socket performance that you’ll be seeing later this year.
Post Your Comment Please log in procdssor sign up to comment.
Athlon 64 X2 Index Power Consumption: This is in stark contrast to Intel’s desktop dual core offerings, which run between 2. Certain programs are currently written for only one thread, and are therefore unable to utilize the processing power of the second core. Web Browsing Multitasking Scenario 4: In the consumer segment of the market as well, the X2 improves upon the performance of the original Athlon 64, especially for multi-threaded software applications.
The ability of processors to execute multiple threads simultaneously is called thread-level parallelism TLP.